HR-ToolKits

An Interview Evaluation Form (also commonly called an Interview Feedback Form) is a structured document or system interviewers use immediately after meeting a candidate to record, score, and summarize their findings. The primary goal is to standardize the assessment process, reduce bias, and provide objective data for the final hiring decision.


📝 Key Sections of an Evaluation Form

A robust evaluation form ensures every candidate is assessed against the same criteria, typically linked to the job description and the company's core values or competencies.

1. Administrative Details

This section ensures proper tracking and context:

  • Candidate Name: The individual being evaluated.
  • Job Title/Requisition ID: The specific position the candidate interviewed for.
  • Interviewer Name & Role: Who conducted the assessment.
  • Interview Date & Type: When the interview occurred (e.g., Screening, Technical, Behavioral, Final Round).
  • Duration: The total time spent interviewing.

2. Core Competency Assessment

This is the heart of the form, where the interviewer rates the candidate on specific, predefined dimensions. A clear rating scale (e.g., 1-5, or Poor/Average/Excellent/Outstanding) is essential.

Category

Description and Examples of Criteria

Technical Skills

Role-Specific Knowledge: Command of required tools, software, or domain expertise. Problem-Solving: Analytical ability and approach to challenging situations.

Behavioral Skills

Communication: Clarity, articulation, and active listening. Teamwork/Collaboration: Ability to work effectively with others. Leadership: Experience and potential for guiding others.

Motivation & Fit

Cultural Alignment: Demonstration of values consistent with the company culture. Drive & Initiative: Level of energy, self-motivation, and desire to grow. Job Readiness: Understanding of the role and realistic expectations.

Experience

Relevant Background: Quality and depth of past roles and accomplishments. Transferable Skills: How past experience will apply to the new role.

3. Justification and Evidence

For each rating given in the competency section, the interviewer must provide specific evidence—quotes, observations, or paraphrased responses—to justify their score. This crucial step prevents subjective bias.

  • Example: If a candidate is rated "Excellent" on Problem-Solving, the evidence might be: "Clearly described the STAR method approach when discussing the project failure, showing strong root-cause analysis."

4. Overall Recommendation

The final section consolidates the assessment into a clear decision:

  • Overall Rating: A final numerical score for the candidate.
  • Hiring Decision: A definitive recommendation:
    • Strong Hire: Recommend enthusiastically.
    • Hire: Recommend, but note minor areas for development.
    • No Hire: Do not recommend, based on critical shortcomings.
  • Key Strengths: The top 2-3 reasons to hire the candidate.
  • Areas for Development/Risk Factors: Any concerns that should be monitored during future interviews or after hiring.
  • Suggested Next Steps: Recommending the next interview stage or an offer.

💡 Importance of Standardization

Using a structured Interview Evaluation Form is vital because it:

  • Reduces Unconscious Bias: It forces interviewers to focus on job-related criteria rather than personal feelings.
  • Improves Quality of Hire: Ensures that the final decision is based on a collective, objective assessment rather than a single interviewer's "gut feeling."
  • Ensures Legal Defensibility: Provides a clear, documented audit trail justifying the hiring or non-hiring decision based on job requirements.